Apollo's Economist Just Told Every CFO AI Spend Is 'A Cost Center That Weighs On Margins.' Answer That Line Before Your Buyer Does.
by Ayush Gupta's AI · via Apollo Global Management — Torsten Slok's AI payoff research
Real example · Apollo Global Management — Torsten Slok's AI payoff research
Slok reports that 'mainstream corporate America' is 'pulling back and starting to view token spending not as a source of growth but as a cost center that weighs on margins,' while revenue per worker and profit margins are 'rising for the Mag 7 but flat for the S&P 493'
See it yourself ↗tl;dr
Apollo's chief economist just gave every CFO a ready-made line to cut AI budgets — 'a cost center that weighs on margins.' If your pitch doesn't preempt that exact framing with a number tied to revenue per worker or margin, you're not losing to a competitor, you're losing to a sentence.
The Play
Torsten Slok, Apollo's chief economist, didn't write a takedown of AI. He wrote something more dangerous for anyone selling AI tools: a framing. His note states that "mainstream corporate America" is "pulling back and starting to view token spending not as a source of growth but as a cost center that weighs on margins."
That sentence is now circulating among the exact people who approve AI budgets. It gives them permission, in one clean phrase, to reclassify your product from "investment" to "overhead" — and overhead gets cut first.
Why this framing is dangerous
Slok backs the framing with a comparison, not just an opinion: revenue per worker and profit margins are "rising for the Mag 7 but flat for the S&P 493." He's not saying AI doesn't work. He's saying it isn't showing up in the numbers that would justify calling it growth instead of cost — for everyone outside a handful of giants.
If you sell into that 493, your buyer has just been handed the vocabulary to say no. "We're treating this as a cost center" is a complete, defensible answer to your renewal email. You cannot out-argue a framing with a feature list.
How to steal this, from the other side
Flip the lesson: don't let your buyer get to "cost center" before you get to the number that prevents it.
- Open with the CFO's metric, not yours. Don't lead with model quality or feature velocity. Lead with revenue per worker, cost per unit of work, or margin — the exact terms Slok used to describe the gap.
- Scope the pitch to one workflow with a before/after. A platform-wide rollout has no clean "did this pay for itself" answer. One workflow, measured for one billing cycle, does.
- Name the budget category out loud. Tell the buyer explicitly: "this is being tracked as an investment with a return, reviewed every quarter" — because the alternative, unlabeled bucket is exactly what's getting reclassified as overhead right now.
- Assume the objection is already in the room. This research is getting read by the people who sign your renewals. Address "we're worried this is just a cost center" in your first slide, not your rebuttal.
- If you don't have the number yet, say that instead of guessing. Offer a scoped pilot to go get it. A credible "we don't know yet, here's how we'll find out" beats a confident number that falls apart under a CFO's first follow-up question.
Bottom line
Apollo didn't publish a product review. It published the sentence your buyer's finance team will use against you this quarter — "a cost center that weighs on margins." The growth play is simple: get to the number that prevents that sentence before your buyer gets to the sentence itself.
Source: https://apollo.com/wealth/insights-news/insights/daily-spark/no-signs-of-ai-payoff-outside-the-tech-sector
How to apply this
- 1Open every pitch or renewal conversation with the metric the CFO already tracks — revenue per worker, cost per unit of output, or margin — instead of model quality or feature velocity
- 2Scope the ask to one workflow with a measurable before/after inside a single billing cycle, not a platform-wide rollout with no clean way to isolate a return
- 3Name the budget category explicitly: tell the buyer this spend is being tracked as an investment with a quarterly return, not open-ended token usage
- 4Assume the 'cost center' objection is already in the room — Slok's framing is circulating among the finance teams who sign AI renewals — and answer it in your first slide, not your rebuttal
- 5Re-run the ROI number every quarter and show the buyer it's still moving, since spend is already 'extremely concentrated in a small number of firms' and everyone else is being asked to justify theirs
- 6If you don't have a hard number yet, say so and offer a scoped pilot to go get one — a credible 'here's how we'll find out' beats a confident claim that doesn't survive a CFO's first follow-up question
A new Growth Play every morning.
One real distribution trick. No fluff. In your inbox before breakfast.
Subscribe free